It's sad to realize what we are up against in defending the dignity of the human person and human sexuality. We're up against people with billions of dollars who think they have the wisdom to know how to best use their money for the common good. I think some of the comments from this article are worth reading so I've posted them below.
Population control is another word for enslaving those that the rich feel are "not good enough". Their view of the perfect world is just having a select few left on earth to tend to their needs but no so many people that would crowd out the beaches when they want to vacation there. This is selfish
Chessie, Baltimore, USA
Real poverty as Mother Teresa said, is that someone must die so that you may live as you want. Who gives these people the right to make these decisions?
taad, Louisville, usa
Bush was mocked for his promotion of abstinence in Africa. But it worked. Teach young people that they have dignity and do not need to sleep with the first person who shows them affection. This reduces unwanted pregnancies and also the spread of AIDS.
Javier, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
Population growth does not cause poverty, greed does. We have a crisis of morality in our world, not overpopulation. The arrogance of these billionaires is discusting. Its the mindset of China where women are forced to kill their babies and of Hitler who considered some human life undesireable.
Prisca, GR, US
AMDG.
Posts
3 comments:
It's funny to see all the money that's been poured into pro-abortion organizations when they could have gone into feeding hungry or sheltering homeless people. Apparently, the easy solution they want is to get rid of these people. No people with problems mean no more problems, huh?
Here's a link to the article, not sure if it's the same one...
http://lifenews.com/int1206.html
By the way, the African country that proved that abstinence and fidelity (monogamy) actually decreases instances of STDs (HIV in this case) was Uganda, versus all the other African countries that instead took aid in the form of contraceptives (condoms) from developed countries like our very own USA to fight HIV infections and failed.
i think i read somewhere that oprah literally profits off of the poor. when she airs an episode with footage of her "doing good" in a community, her ratings go up and her ad revenue increases.
drawing an analogy between this and a "traditional investment" - she spends, say, $1 mil to donate to the poor, but as a result of this donation and the publicity it recieves, her ad revenue goes up 25%. a pretty good return on investment ratio huh?!
That's a really great return on investment!! Which makes it all the more messed up!!
Post a Comment